Το ζήτημα της πείνας: Πώς θα δοθεί ένα τέλος στον παγκόσμιο υποσιτισμό

Ένα αγόρι τρώει ζαχαροκάλαμο στο χωριό Fakirpara, περίπου 80 μίλια βορειοδυτικά της Καλκούτα στα ανατολικά της Ινδίας, στις 11 Οκτωβρίου 2007. PARTH SANYAL/REUTERS

Την περασμένη εβδομάδα, κατά την 41η σύνοδό τους, οι χώρες του G7 ανέλαβαν μια ασυνήθιστα συγκεκριμένη δέσμευση: Να δώσουν ένα τέλος στην πείνα και τον υποσιτισμό για 500 εκατομμύρια άτομα μέχρι το 2030. Πληροφορίες εκ των έσω υπονοούν ότι ο συγκεκριμένος στόχος αποτελούσε προσωπική προτεραιότητα της Άνγκελα Μέρκελ, της περιβόητης επιστημονικής Γερμανίδας καγκελαρίου που ήταν και οικοδεσπότης της εκδήλωσης. Ωστόσο, παρά την προσοχή για την παγκόσμια πείνα που δίνεται από την υψηλού επιπέδου πολιτική, κάτι που σίγουρα αποτελεί θετικό βήμα, η δέσμευση του G7 εξακολουθεί να είναι ημιτελής.

Trapped Between Assad, Israel, and al Qaeda

On June 5, a Druze sheikh in Qalb Lozeh, a village in Syria’s northwest Idlib province, sent out a desperate voice message over WhatsApp calling for help against fighters from the steadily approaching al-Nusra Front, al Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate.

“They’ve been coming to our homes, and [they] want to remove our sons, our boys between 10 and 14 years old, and put them in a training camp for two months. We don’t know what they’re going to teach them, and they’re threatening us,” the sheikh said in the recording. “They want to take away our weapons.”

What Borders Mean to Europe

Europe today is a continent of borders. The second-smallest continent in the world has more than 50 distinct, sovereign nation-states. Many of these are part of the European Union. At the core of the EU project is an effort to reduce the power and significance of these borders without actually abolishing them — in theory, an achievable goal. But history is not kind to theoretical solutions.

Today, Europe faces three converging crises that are ultimately about national borders, what they mean and who controls them. These crises appear distinct: Immigration from the Islamic world, the Greek economic predicament, and the conflict in Ukraine would seem to have little to do with each other. But in fact they all derive, in different ways, from the question of what borders mean.

The eurozone's 'five presidents' report': An assessment

The long-awaited report rightly aims to complete a financial union in the eurozone, but over-emphasises structural reforms and underplays the need for stronger counter-cyclical policies.

The eurozone in its current institutional setup may not survive the next severe political or economic crisis, and needs reform. The presidents of the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB), the European Council, the European Parliament and the Eurogroup have now presented their widely anticipated report – the ‘five presidents’ report’ – on how to complete the monetary union. It contains some important proposals, such as a strong emphasis on completing the banking and capital markets unions. But two key aspects are missing: a more activist ECB in order to prevent future shortfalls in demand, and strongly counter-cyclical fiscal policies at the national level. What is more, the case for a convergence of structural policies in the eurozone is less strong than the report assumes.